Contracts
Opinion
# 2001-049
Discussion of the application of the three year contract
limitation on certain public contracts. Discussion providing
that the chairman of the county commission must sign contracts
approved by the commission.
Opinion
#2002-065
Discussion of local public officials contracting with
the governmental entity they represent.
Opinion
#2002-081
Discussion explaining that the Relationship Disclosure
Form required by Act No. 2001-955 does not apply in interagency
contracts between state agencies or departments.
Opinion
#2002-171
Discussion providing that a contract employee of the county
cannot continue in his or her position once the contract
has expired if the contract is not renewed or if the commission
is deadlocked as to whether to renew.
Opinion # 2004-115
Discussion providing that a governmental agency may enter into an agreement with a University to give the University exclusive use of governmentally owned and operated property in exchange for the government’s use of other University facilities.
Opinion # 2004-145
Discussion providing that a county commission may make contracts through the revenue commissioner regarding reappraisal of county property, and can ratify such contracts and payments, where the county commission was not initially made a party to the contract.
Opinion # 2005-017
Discussion providing that a governmental entity may enter into a contract with benefits to each party, but that if it grants a private party an exclusive franchise, it must be competitively bid.
Opinion # 2005-046
Discussion providing that a municipality may contract with a volunteer fire department to provide services to the community, and discussion of several aspects of such contracts.
|
