|
Executive Director's Report - November/December 1999
1999
Special Session Yields Agreement on Franchise Tax
Special sessions of the Alabama Legislature are often trying
times for county government. The pace of the sessions oftentimes
presents challenges for those who are working to represent
the best interests of Alabama county government.
However, the second special session of 1999 ended on November
29 with the passage of two ACCA-supported bills and a number
of other new laws important to counties.
Gov. Don Siegelman called the special session to consider
a four-bill package aimed at filling the $120 million hole
left by a U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down a major
portion of Alabama's franchise tax. Before adjourning on
November 29 the Alabama Legislature approved four new statutes
that removed the unconstitutional portions of the franchise
tax while preserving the tax at a new, lower rate. The tax
on banks and insurance companies was also increased and
foreign corporations -- those not organized in Alabama --
were required to pay the state's shares tax.
In
order to reach this agreement with the business community,
the Legislature also passed a constitutional amendment setting
a March 21, 1999 election on a 1.5 percent increase in the
state's corporate income tax. Should the voters ratify this
proposal, the state's shares tax will be abolished. The
individual bills are explained below.
HB 1 (Act 99-665)
This legislation reinstated the state's franchise tax at
a common rate for both foreign and domestic corporations,
increased the state's financial institution and insurance
taxes and extended the state's shares taxes to both foreign
and domestic taxes. The resulting revenue is expected to
be enough to replace the loss revenue from the demise of
the franchise tax on foreign corporations.
The most important aspect of the legislation for counties
is a provision requiring the state to continue to pay --
from the proceeds of the franchise tax revenue -- the amount
of money each county received in BOTH franchise tax and
shares tax revenue during the 1998-99 fiscal year. Without
this provision, counties would have almost certainly realized
a decrease in funding because of the restructuring of the
new tax.
Also included in the Act is a provision that this county
revenue be increased each year by a very modest growth factor
of three-quarters of one percent, beginning in the year
2000. Although the Association staff initially sought a
larger growth guarantee, this increase was a reasonable
approach given the volatile nature of the special session.
This change means counties no longer receive any revenue
from the state's shares tax. However, beginning in 2000
counties will receive a state allocation equal to their
shares revenue, plus the growth factor, from the proceeds
of the franchise tax. For this reason, it will be important
to defend the state's franchise tax even more vigorously
in the future.
HB 2 (Act 99-650)
This Act takes effect only if the referendum proposing the
increase in corporate income tax is approved on March 21.
If voters approve the increase, this measure will shift
a portion of a number of state taxes -- leasing, tobacco,
sales and use -- from the state education trust fund to
the state general fund. This change will not impact county
government.
HB 3 (Act 99-600)
This Act sets a statewide election on March 21 for the purpose
of increasing the state's corporate income tax rate from
5 percent to 6.5 percent. The increase in revenue, earmarked
for the special education trust fund, will be off-set in
large part by the shift of other taxes to the state general
fund provided in Act 99-650 above.
HB 4 (Act 99-664)
This Act is the enabling legislation for Act 99-600 and
has no direct impact on county government, with two notable
exceptions. It only becomes effective if the referendum
on March 21 is approved.
First, the Act abolishes the state corporate shares tax
and replaces that revenue with the proceeds from the increase
in corporate income tax. Because the shares tax will be
abolished, it was necessary to shift the county-portion
of the shares tax revenue to the new franchise tax, as discussed
above.
Second, this Act includes new language in the list of exemptions
from corporate income tax to make it clear that county governments
and their instrumentalities are exempt from the corporate
income tax. Although the Association staff is unaware of
any attempts to require counties or related organizations
to pay corporate income tax, this new language provides
insurance from any future attempts.
ACCA Legislation
HB 73 (Act 99-663)
This new statute broadens the definition of electronic vote
counting equipment to include the mark-sense voting equipment
already in use by a number of counties. This change will
ensure that those counties using this system -- and other
counties that choose to utilize the system in future --
will be within the law. The Act also establishes a procedure
for testing any modifications or changes to the equipment.
Special appreciation is expressed to the sponsor in the
House -- Rep. Marcel Black -- and to the Senate sponsor
-- Sen. Pat Lindsey.
SB 10(Act 99-703)
As signed into law by Gov. Don Siegelman, this Act amends
the 1852 statute that had prohibited county commissioners
from being appointed to other public boards. Largely ignored,
this old statute had become a topic of conversation around
the state.
The amended statute ratifies any actions taken by commissioners
who were serving on other boards in the past. The Act also
prohibits commissioners from accepting expense reimbursement
from BOTH the public board and the county commission and
also says no more than one member of the commission can
be appointed to any particular board. The Association expresses
its thanks to the Senate sponsor -- Sen. Tom Butler -- and
to the House sponsor -- Rep. Bill Dukes.
The
2000 regular session of the Alabama Legislature begins on
February 1. This session will certainly present a number
of new opportunities and challenges. Elsewhere in this issue
you will find a copy of the Association's Legislative Program
for the new year. The program includes the priorities for
2000. The passage of this legislation will require the support
of ALL county officials.
|